Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
|
|
Vestiges. Credit: Bing Shen/Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [VIA SCIENCE] Another Big Bang for BiologyBy Phil Berardelli The main points of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, which he carefully laid out in The Origin of Species 149 years ago, have stood the test of time. But where Darwin assumed that natural selection proceeds slowly and orderly--much the way Isaac Newton imagined a clockwork universe--modern investigations have shown that the process more resembles the chaotic world of quantum physics. Scores of new groups of species can appear within a few million years. By far the biggest and most famous of these events is the Cambrian explosion, a period between 542 million and 520 million years ago, when due to some still-unknown cause, the ancestors of nearly all extant groups, or phyla, of animals appeared. Now a team of paleontologists from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg think they've found a second great explosion of life. The researchers have performed the most detailed analysis yet of strange fossils from Australia, known as the Ediacara biota. They represent the oldest known multicellular organisms, which emerged about 575 million years ago. The morphology of the Ediacara organisms is so different from that of previous life forms and from one another that they must qualify as several distinct new classes of species, the team argues tomorrow in Science. Many of the organisms, which resembled leaflike fronds and fractal forms, emerged abruptly over about 25 million years during the Avalon period, so the team has named the event the Avalon explosion. The event is "a perfect match in time" to a sudden infusion of oxygen into the oceans, which may have sparked the explosion of marine biodiversity, says geobiologist and co-author Shuhai Xiao. Another possible stimulus, he suggests, is a warming of the ocean that occurred back then as an ice age was ending. Whatever the cause, there was one big difference between the Avalon and Cambrian explosions: The Cambrian produced groups that endure to this day, Xiao says, whereas the Ediacaran forms soon vanished. The idea that the Ediacara fossils evolved a wide range of shapes and forms very quickly seems "reasonable and sound" in the context of evolutionary history, says evolutionary biologist Andrew Knoll of Harvard University. But that might not be the most striking aspect of the find. Rather, he explains, it's that these creatures evolved "much the same way as in later evolutionary radiations, large and small," suggesting that explosions in diversity might share similar dynamics. Paleobiologist Richard Aronson of the Dauphin Island Sea Lab in Alabama says the study will spark new questions. Why, for example, was the Avalon explosion quashed, he asks, "but the Cambrian explosion prevailed and gave us life as we know it." Related sites
Letters
In summarizing Darwin's views from "Origin
of Species," Phil Berrardelli writes:
"But where Darwin assumed that natural selection
proceeds slowly and orderly--much the way Isaac
Newton imagined a clockwork universe--modern
investigations have shown that the process more
resembles the chaotic world of quantum physics."
Not so, really. Darwin made several references to the
chaotic and unpredictable nature of evolution. As to
his supposed faith in uniformitarian development, I
cite from "Origin", the final edition, Chapter 4
(p.123 in my old Collier Books paperback). [Darwin
has just presented a diagram of a hypothetical
phylogenetic "tree"]: "But I must here remark that I do not suppose that the process ever goes on so regularly as is
represented in the diagram, though in itself made
somewhat irregular, nor that it goes on continuously;
it is far more probable that each form remains for
long periods unaltered, and then again undergoes
modification."
While Darwin doesn't quite call on catastrophism to
aid in his natural selection process, we nevertheless
see that Eldredge and Gould were not the first with
the "punctuated equilibrium" idea.
H.Paul Lillebo
|